- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:19:57 +0900
- To: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
The minutes are at
http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html
and below as text.
Regards, Felix.
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
i18n core working group
24 Jan 2006
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jan/0038.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-irc
Attendees
Present
Felix, Francois, Karunesh, Mary, Richard, Vijay
Regrets
Chair
Francois
Scribe
Felix
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]css selectors review
2. [6]ws i18n
3. [7]action items
4. [8]getting feedback on first letter
5. [9]cdf review
http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-cdf/
* [10]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
css selectors review
felix: discussion on namespace binding and other topics, ongoing
ws i18n
mary: put comments from IBM and MS on comments page
... worked on how ws i18n and Java implementation alignment
<fyergeau>
[11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Jan/00
06.html
[11]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Jan/0006.html
Mary: Most important is how this relates to policy
... what we are specifying through policy, and what directly
... I spend the night working on the security ws policy document
(100 of pages!)
action items
[12]http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg04350.html
[12] http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg04350.html
<scribe> ACTION: all to look at new comments from QT on charmod norm
(PENDING) [recorded in
[13]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: felix to find a stable uri to bcp47, rather than
point to RFC 3066 (DONE) [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02]
[15]ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/bcp/bcp47.txt
[15] ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/bcp/bcp47.txt
francois: I am worried about this address
... it is hard to find if you have no pointer
<fyergeau> CSS does do matching, so it would not be enough to cite
the non-matching part of RFC 3066bis. We need to know more on the
status of RFC 3066bis in general.
<scribe> ACTION: felix to summarize RFC 3066bis and to contact
Adisson and Mark on this [recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03]
<scribe> ACTION: ACTION: felix to put bidi mirror on review
radar(DONE) [recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04]
<scribe> ACTION: continue the discussion of open topics next week
(ONGOING) [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05]
<r12a-tax-rtn> [19]http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews
[19] http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews
francois: as a wg, we don't have to tackle this
... so let's drop this (on the 30rth, at the end of the deadline)
<scribe> ACTION: felix to ask addison for preparations for meetings
with ws folks (ONGOING) [recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06]
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to contact Moataz about HP replacement and TP
(ONGOING) [recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07]
<scribe> ACTION: francois to go through
[22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2005Dec/00
03.html [recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08]
[22]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2005Dec/0003.html
<scribe> ACTION: francois to review the proposal is to eliminate
overriding of bidi mirroring (DROPPED) [recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09]
getting feedback on first letter
<r12a-tax-rtn> [25]http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/?p=40
[25] http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/?p=40
ri: this blog asks for feedback on first letter
... if you are happy with this, I would send this out to
www-international
... and other lists
Francois: good idea
felix: +1
francois: the question is if there is some tradition of its usage
... if there is no usage tradition, we don't have to dam css to have
this feature
ri: I have changed the first thing you mentioned, will change the
rest later
karunseh: as for indic languages, the first character does not have
specific style
... in your example, the first character is a vowel sign, and it
does normally not have a specific styling
ri: if you have "A ACUTE", that is fine
... if you have "A" plus "ACUTE", that are two characters
... that is why we proposed grapheme clusters to css
... as for indic languages, the first syllable might be a different
unit
... but you are saying that both character or syllable might not be
useful for Indic, right?
Karunesh: Yes
Francois: the blog will help tremendously to decide what has to be
done
cdf review [26]http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-cdf/
[26] http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-cdf/
<karunesh> felix,richard: we have few more points to discussed with
you after the call regarding indic languages
<r12a-tax-rtn> ok karunesh
IDL mechanisms are the meat of the specs:
[27]http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#idl-definitions
[27] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#idl-definitions
ri: spelling error for pishing
comment 2
francois: agreed
comment 4
ri: you can't make a mandatory feature
... only if the document supports IRIs
francois: agreed
comment 5
francois: If you ask an SVG document about language information
... and the doc. is inside an HTML document
... the xml:lang in the HTML applies to the SVG as well
... it seems that the compounding specs should say
... you should get the same results for both inclusion and reference
felix: I reformulate that comment in that sense
francois: if it works for DOM in general, it should work for
language too
... or xml:space
ri: or dir
francois: mention xml:space as well
comment 6
ri: the same thing as comment 5, right?
francois: drop this
ri: write in a note that character encoding is not an issue, because
it is all xml and DOM. If not, please pay attention
comment 7
francois: the same as 4
comment 10
francois: drop that
richard: in general, it might be good to have several tables for the
review
karunesh: I will make more examples and send them to you
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: felix to summarize RFC 3066bis and to contact Adisson
and Mark on this [recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: francois to go through
[29]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2005Dec/00
03.html [recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08]
[29]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2005Dec/0003.html
[PENDING] ACTION: all to look at new comments from QT on charmod
norm [recorded in
[31]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01]
[PENDING] ACTION: continue the discussion of open topics next week
[recorded in
[32]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05]
[PENDING] ACTION: felix to ask addison for preparations for meetings
with ws folks [recorded in
[33]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06]
[PENDING] ACTION: Felix to contact Moataz about HP replacement and
TP [recorded in
[34]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07]
[DONE] ACTION: felix to find a stable uri to bcp47, rather than
point to RFC 3066 [recorded in
[35]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02]
[DONE] ACTION: felix to put bidi mirror on review radar [recorded in
[36]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04]
[DROPPED] ACTION: francois to review the proposal is to eliminate
overriding of bidi mirroring [recorded in
[37]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [38]scribe.perl version 1.127
([39]CVS log)
$Date: 2006/01/25 06:17:37 $
[38] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[39] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 06:20:15 UTC