- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:19:57 +0900
- To: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
The minutes are at http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html and below as text. Regards, Felix. [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ i18n core working group 24 Jan 2006 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jan/0038.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-irc Attendees Present Felix, Francois, Karunesh, Mary, Richard, Vijay Regrets Chair Francois Scribe Felix Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]css selectors review 2. [6]ws i18n 3. [7]action items 4. [8]getting feedback on first letter 5. [9]cdf review http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-cdf/ * [10]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ css selectors review felix: discussion on namespace binding and other topics, ongoing ws i18n mary: put comments from IBM and MS on comments page ... worked on how ws i18n and Java implementation alignment <fyergeau> [11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Jan/00 06.html [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Jan/0006.html Mary: Most important is how this relates to policy ... what we are specifying through policy, and what directly ... I spend the night working on the security ws policy document (100 of pages!) action items [12]http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg04350.html [12] http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg04350.html <scribe> ACTION: all to look at new comments from QT on charmod norm (PENDING) [recorded in [13]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01] <scribe> ACTION: felix to find a stable uri to bcp47, rather than point to RFC 3066 (DONE) [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02] [15]ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/bcp/bcp47.txt [15] ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/bcp/bcp47.txt francois: I am worried about this address ... it is hard to find if you have no pointer <fyergeau> CSS does do matching, so it would not be enough to cite the non-matching part of RFC 3066bis. We need to know more on the status of RFC 3066bis in general. <scribe> ACTION: felix to summarize RFC 3066bis and to contact Adisson and Mark on this [recorded in [16]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03] <scribe> ACTION: ACTION: felix to put bidi mirror on review radar(DONE) [recorded in [17]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04] <scribe> ACTION: continue the discussion of open topics next week (ONGOING) [recorded in [18]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05] <r12a-tax-rtn> [19]http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews [19] http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews francois: as a wg, we don't have to tackle this ... so let's drop this (on the 30rth, at the end of the deadline) <scribe> ACTION: felix to ask addison for preparations for meetings with ws folks (ONGOING) [recorded in [20]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06] <scribe> ACTION: Felix to contact Moataz about HP replacement and TP (ONGOING) [recorded in [21]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07] <scribe> ACTION: francois to go through [22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2005Dec/00 03.html [recorded in [23]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08] [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2005Dec/0003.html <scribe> ACTION: francois to review the proposal is to eliminate overriding of bidi mirroring (DROPPED) [recorded in [24]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09] getting feedback on first letter <r12a-tax-rtn> [25]http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/?p=40 [25] http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/?p=40 ri: this blog asks for feedback on first letter ... if you are happy with this, I would send this out to www-international ... and other lists Francois: good idea felix: +1 francois: the question is if there is some tradition of its usage ... if there is no usage tradition, we don't have to dam css to have this feature ri: I have changed the first thing you mentioned, will change the rest later karunseh: as for indic languages, the first character does not have specific style ... in your example, the first character is a vowel sign, and it does normally not have a specific styling ri: if you have "A ACUTE", that is fine ... if you have "A" plus "ACUTE", that are two characters ... that is why we proposed grapheme clusters to css ... as for indic languages, the first syllable might be a different unit ... but you are saying that both character or syllable might not be useful for Indic, right? Karunesh: Yes Francois: the blog will help tremendously to decide what has to be done cdf review [26]http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-cdf/ [26] http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-cdf/ <karunesh> felix,richard: we have few more points to discussed with you after the call regarding indic languages <r12a-tax-rtn> ok karunesh IDL mechanisms are the meat of the specs: [27]http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#idl-definitions [27] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#idl-definitions ri: spelling error for pishing comment 2 francois: agreed comment 4 ri: you can't make a mandatory feature ... only if the document supports IRIs francois: agreed comment 5 francois: If you ask an SVG document about language information ... and the doc. is inside an HTML document ... the xml:lang in the HTML applies to the SVG as well ... it seems that the compounding specs should say ... you should get the same results for both inclusion and reference felix: I reformulate that comment in that sense francois: if it works for DOM in general, it should work for language too ... or xml:space ri: or dir francois: mention xml:space as well comment 6 ri: the same thing as comment 5, right? francois: drop this ri: write in a note that character encoding is not an issue, because it is all xml and DOM. If not, please pay attention comment 7 francois: the same as 4 comment 10 francois: drop that richard: in general, it might be good to have several tables for the review karunesh: I will make more examples and send them to you Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: felix to summarize RFC 3066bis and to contact Adisson and Mark on this [recorded in [28]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03] [NEW] ACTION: francois to go through [29]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2005Dec/00 03.html [recorded in [30]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08] [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2005Dec/0003.html [PENDING] ACTION: all to look at new comments from QT on charmod norm [recorded in [31]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01] [PENDING] ACTION: continue the discussion of open topics next week [recorded in [32]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05] [PENDING] ACTION: felix to ask addison for preparations for meetings with ws folks [recorded in [33]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06] [PENDING] ACTION: Felix to contact Moataz about HP replacement and TP [recorded in [34]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07] [DONE] ACTION: felix to find a stable uri to bcp47, rather than point to RFC 3066 [recorded in [35]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02] [DONE] ACTION: felix to put bidi mirror on review radar [recorded in [36]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04] [DROPPED] ACTION: francois to review the proposal is to eliminate overriding of bidi mirroring [recorded in [37]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09] [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [38]scribe.perl version 1.127 ([39]CVS log) $Date: 2006/01/25 06:17:37 $ [38] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [39] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 06:20:15 UTC