- From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:08:35 +0000
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: ishida@w3.org, www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
I cannot see that this change accomplishes anything. RFC 3066 says "- Dialect or variant information, such as en-scouse" where the phrase "such as" is clearly essential. The use of "en-scouse" as an example in no way precludes the possibility of "en-cockney" being an equally valid production. Philip Taylor -------- Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 ishida@w3.org wrote: > >>Since en-cockney is not currently an allowable value according to >>RFC3066, I suggest you use something different, such as en-GB (UK >>English). > > > The working group discussed this. > > We used "en-scouse" instead. > > If this does not satisfy you, please let us know. > > Thanks,
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 18:08:59 UTC