- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:36:43 +0900
- To: "Mark Davis" <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
- Cc: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>, public-i18n-core@w3.org
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:02:45 +0900, Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org> wrote: > > The corrigendum was passed before 4.1, and incorporated into version > 4.1, so the only new material for 5.0 (the next version) is what is in > yellow. That being said, the UTC is glad to get feedback on any part of > the document, new or old. Thank you, Mark. That helps. I have currently no comment. Regards, Felix. > > Mark > > Felix Sasaki wrote: > >> >> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:07:32 +0900, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> FYI >> >> >> I'm currently having a look at this. The main changes concern >> versioning, see section 3 ( >> http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr15/tr15-26.html#Versioning ). >> >> I don't see an issue in section 3.1 "Stability of Normalized Forms" >> which says "A normalized string is guaranteed to be stable: that is, >> once normalized, a string is normalized according to all future >> versions of Unicode.". >> >> I don't see an issue in section 3.3 "Guaranteeing Process Stability", >> which describes how corrigenda between versions of Unicode should be >> handled. >> >> Corrigenda 2 and 3 (changes in normalization behavior of the character >> U+FB1D HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ, and U+F951 Normalization) are two >> example corrigenda which fall under section 3.3. >> >> " Corrigendum #5: Normalization Idempotency fixed a problem in the >> description of the normalization process for some instances of >> particular sequences. Such instances never occur in meaningful text.". >> As a background to this corrigendum, there is a public review issue >> http://www.unicode.org/review/pr-29.html . It proposes the following >> change to definition D2: >> >> "D2. In any character sequence beginning with a starter S, a character >> C is blocked from S if and only if there is some character B between S >> and C, and either B is a starter or it has the same or higher >> combining class as C." >> The change is the insertion of "or higher". >> >> The description of this corrigendum >> (http://www.unicode.org/versions/corrigendum5.html) mentions that >> problems arising from the old definition D2 have no "realistic >> scenarios [...] that would present such problems.". >> >> I'm not sure about this corrigendum. I will take a closer look. Let's >> talk about it on a call. >> >> Regards, Felix. >> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: unicore-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicore-bounce@unicode.org] On >>> Behalf Of Rick McGowan >>> Sent: 14 January 2006 01:03 >>> To: unicode@unicode.org >>> Subject: New Public Review Issue: UAX #15 >>> >>> The Unicode Technical Committee has posted a new issue for public >>> review and >>> comment. Details are on the following web page: >>> >>> http://www.unicode.org/review/ >>> >>> Review period for the new item closes on January 31, 2005 >>> >>> Please see the page for links to discussion and relevant documents. >>> Briefly, the new issue is: >>> >>> >>> Issue #86: UAX #15: Unicode Normalization Forms >>> >>> There are no substantive changes in this version of UAX #15. Sections >>> were >>> added to clarify stability and versioning issues, and to make some >>> formatting changes for Unicode 5.0. >>> >>> http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr15/tr15-26.html >>> >>> >>> If you have comments for official UTC consideration, please post them >>> by >>> submitting your comments through our feedback & reporting page: >>> >>> http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html >>> >>> If you wish to discuss issues on the Unicode mail list, then please >>> use the >>> following link to subscribe (if necessary). Please be aware that >>> discussion >>> comments on the Unicode mail list are not automatically recorded as >>> input to >>> the UTC. You must use the reporting link above to generate comments >>> for UTC >>> consideration. >>> >>> http://www.unicode.org/consortium/distlist.html >>> >>> Regards, >>> Rick McGowan >>> Unicode, Inc. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 14:36:53 UTC