- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:44:38 +0000
- To: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/ Comment 10 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/ Editorial/substantive: E Location in reviewed document: Sec. 6.3.1 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#attribute-representation] Comment: "including "en", "en-US", and "en-cockney"" Since en-cockney is not currently an allowable value according to RFC3066, I suggest you use something different, such as en-GB (UK English). > From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] > Sent: 20 January 2006 15:22 > Regarding #10, while I am not sure what's wrong with > en-cockney, it would be good if the I18N Core Working Group > could check other TRs and RFCs for this error and report it > as appropriate. This would then be a rather common error. > From: Richard Ishida > Sent: 20 January 2006 15:54 > > Regarding #10, while I am not sure what's wrong with > > en-cockney, > > Allowable values according to RFC 3066 are > <iso-language-code> eg. 'en', or > <iso-language-code>-<iso-country-code> eg. 'en-GB', or > a tag from the IANA registry at > http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-tags (in which > en-cockney does not > appear). > > > it would be good if the I18N Core Working Group > > could check other TRs and RFCs for this error and report it > > as appropriate. This would then be a rather common error. > > Yes, we should.
Received on Saturday, 21 January 2006 10:44:39 UTC