- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:32:08 +0000
- To: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/ Comment 2 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/ Editorial/substantive: E Location in reviewed document: General Comment: Your notion of "type": It would be good if you note that there are different notions of types, e.g. the element name as a type (as in the case of CSS) as the XML Schema notion of types. > From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] > Sent: 20 January 2006 15:22 > I disagree with #2, the term element type has > well-established semantics in XML and SGML, I don't see how > explaining that element types are not data types, or > personality types, or whatever. We should change s/type > element selectors/element type selectors/ in 1.3 though.
Received on Saturday, 21 January 2006 10:32:17 UTC