- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:00:19 +0100
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: 'www-style Mailing List' <www-style@w3.org>, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Richard Ishida wrote: > http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/ Hi Richard (and I18N WG) #1 you usually add a reference when the document is referenced somewhere in the prose, right ? That's not the case... #3 the title is "Selectors". What is CSS specific in it exactly ? #4 I tend to disagree with changing 'hreflang' to 'foo'. We are not only giving here a meaningful example. Nothing in the prose says the selector is restricted to lang or hreflang #5 the spec does not rely on a given version of XML. It can select in any kind of markup tgree-based language. #6 "A type selector containing a namespace prefix that has not been previously declared is an invalid selector. The mechanism for declaring a namespace prefix is left up to the language implementing Selectors. In CSS, such a mechanism is defined in the General Syntax module." #7 we only use hreflang because it's a commonly used and well known HTML4 attribute. That way, the readers of the spec understand easily what it is about. #8 ok #11 highly desireable is not always in line with browser performance... #13 ok #14 "For example, in HTML [HTML4], the language is determined by a combination of the lang attribute, the meta element, and possibly by information from the protocol (such as HTTP headers). XML uses an attribute called xml:lang, and there may be other document language-specific methods for determining the language." #15 yep, and I wonder how we missed that one ! #18 absolutely #19 a pause ?-) #20 oh, no please... That's certainly something I don't want us to dive into. We could link to a definition, but adding one ourselves is too dangerous. #21 no, Selectors don't need Syntax to be implemented. </Daniel>
Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 16:00:54 UTC