- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:57:48 +0200
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-svg@w3.org, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
On Thursday, October 20, 2005, 12:01:02 PM, Martin wrote:
MD> At 22:06 05/10/19, Chris Lilley wrote:
>>
>>On Monday, April 25, 2005, 12:47:44 AM, Bjoern wrote:
>>BH> No it does not, XML 1.0 Third Edition clearly refers to RFC 3066 or its
>>BH> successor.
>>
>>Yes, it does. Sorry, we misunderstood you to be saying "remove the ref
>>to 3066 and replace it with a ref to an ID" which we were, naturally,
>>unwilling to do.
>>
>>Now that we understand what you are actually asking, we are happy to
>>agree and have updated the references to say 3066 "or its successor on
>>the IETF Standards Track".
>>
>>Please let us know if this is not satisfactory, within two weeks.
MD> Hello Chris,
MD> This is close to satisfactory, but not exactly. RFC 3066 is a BCP,
MD> and its successor is also going to be a BCP, so neither of them
MD> are on the IETF Standards Track (which goes Proposed -> Draft -> Standard).
MD> Your wording is therefore too precise,
ah, okay.
MD> and you should change it to
MD> the wording in the XML Spec (or something equivalent if you really need to).
Looking at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204/#sec-existing-stds
IETF RFC 3066
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force). RFC 3066: Tags for the
Identification of Languages, ed. H. Alvestrand. 2001. (See
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3066.txt.)
I don't see any suitable "or its successor" text to use.
--
Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org
Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2005 10:58:06 UTC