Re: VBWG official response to last call issue

* Martin Duerst wrote:
>So we herewith request the following changes to VXML2, which we understand
>will be carried over to VXML21:
>
>- Change the XML Schema definition of URI.datatype from:
>
>   <xsd:simpleType name='URI.datatype'>
>        <xsd:annotation>
>            <xsd:documentation>URI (RFC2396)</xsd:documentation>
>        </xsd:annotation>
>        <xsd:restriction base='xsd:anyURI'/>
>   </xsd:simpleType>
>
>   to:
>
>   <xsd:simpleType name='URI.datatype'>
>        <xsd:annotation>
>            <xsd:documentation>IRI (RFC3987)</xsd:documentation>
>        </xsd:annotation>
>        <xsd:restriction base='xsd:anyURI'/>
>   </xsd:simpleType>

This would introduce ambiguity into the specification as it would
be unclear whether implementations must process this type per the
requirements in XML Schema or the requirements in RFC 3987 (which
are different).
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 07:04:30 UTC