- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 01:05:11 +0100
- To: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
* Richard Ishida wrote: >Please find the comments of the i18n Core WG on XHTML2 at >http://www.w3.org/International/2004/10/xhtml2-i18n-review.html Part of that is "We would like you to require the xml:lang attribute on the <html> tag." I hope you can elaborate on this point a bit. It is clear from the request that the Working Group would like all XHTML 2.0 authors to properly specify language information, but it is not clear to me how it would help to require the xml:lang attribute. This seems similar to e.g. the alt attribute on the img element in HTML 4.01 which is required, too. Many authors do not use it and those who do, often do not use it properly. It is even common that authoring tools insert some default value that is often worse than omitting it. It thus seems reasonable to expect that many XHTML 2.0 documents will be invalid due to a missing xml:lang attribute or that the xml:lang attribute has an improper value, e.g. because the authoring tool made some assumptions that did not hold true (e.g., the english version of an authoring tool running on an english version of the operating sys- tem might assume that all documents are written in english and thus declare xml:lang="en" unless the author specifies a different value.) Or authors just copy and paste the incomprehensible header required for XHTML 2.0 documents without changing the xml:lang attribute. That in fact happens already for XHTML 1.0. Since authors, authoring tool developers, etc. do not currently give proper language identification much thought, it seems the Working Group expects quite some change in the XHTML community. I do not see how this might be warranted, and it seems quite inconsistent with other aspects of XHTML 2.0, for example, for images are no longer re- quired to explicitly specify no alternate text (or alternate text.) But I might be missing some research the Working Group has done on this in which case I appreciate a pointer to the results. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2005 00:06:37 UTC