Re: Comments on UTR #36

My apologies for not being clear.

We (the Unicode consortium security subcommittee) are not taking them as an
official response from the I18N Core WG. (However, we appreciate early
non-official comments as well).

‎Mark

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Addison Phillips" <addison.phillips@quest.com>
To: "Mark Davis" <mark.davis@jtcsv.com>; "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>;
<public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Cc: "Marcos Sanz/Denic" <sanz@denic.de>
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 08:31
Subject: RE: Comments on UTR #36


> Clarification:
>
> Mark is writing on behalf of Unicode, I believe. The I18N Core WG hasn't
reviewed the comments yet.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Addison
>
> Addison P. Phillips
> Globalization Architect, Quest Software
> Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group
>
> Internationalization is not a feature.
> It is an architecture.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-core-
> > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mark Davis
> > Sent: jeudi 2 juin 2005 08:28
> > To: Felix Sasaki; public-i18n-core@w3.org
> > Cc: Marcos Sanz/Denic
> > Subject: Re: Comments on UTR #36
> >
> >
> > Marcos,
> >
> > We appreciate your detailed comments; those will be very helpful. We'll
> > get
> > back to you if we have questions on any of them.
> >
> > ‎Mark
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>
> > To: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
> > Cc: "Marcos Sanz/Denic" <sanz@denic.de>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 02:28
> > Subject: Comments on UTR #36
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > >
> > > Marcos Sanz, who I met on this years Unicode conference, has kindly
> > > provided a comment on UTR #36. You will find the comment at [1]
> > >
> > > Best, Felix.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-
> > international/2005AprJun/0028.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 2 June 2005 15:43:20 UTC