- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 01:20:24 +0900
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
Hi all, I went through all issues lists, see [1]-[5]. I found no entries in the issues list of the data model [1] spec for Martin's comments, and in the issues list for the functions and operators spec [5] only one entry. There is no issues list at all for xqueryx. On whitespaces I found s.t. which might be helpful [6]: "Decided 21-24 Jun 2004, Norman Walsh (2004-07-19) White space is now significant in all cases except element-only content where it is not significant. The draft has been clarified to reflect this." [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/data-model-issues.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xquery-serialization-issues.html [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xquery-issues.html [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpath-issues.html [5] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpath-functions-issues.html#qt-2004Feb0388-01 [6] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/data-model-issues.html#toc.qt-2003Dec0085-01 Our current reviews: http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xpath-review.html http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-func-op-review.html (still on its way) http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-serialization-review.html http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-datamodel-review.html http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xquery-review.html http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xqueryx-review.html
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2005 16:20:32 UTC