- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 12:12:32 +0100
- To: "川幡 太一 ( Taichi KAWABATA )" <kawabata.taichi@gmail.com>, 董福興 Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>
- CC: CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, ethantw@me.com, Kawamori Masahito <kawamori@w3.org>
On 21/12/2013 08:50 , 川幡 太一 ( Taichi KAWABATA ) wrote: > should be split to multiple ruby such as :: > > <ruby> > <rb>你</rb> > <rtc><rt>ㄌㄧˋ</rt></rtc> > <rtc>Lí</rt></rtc> > </ruby> > <ruby> > <rb>敢</rb><rb>有</rb> > <rtc><rt>ㄍㆰˋ</rt><rt>ㄨ˫</rt></rtc> > <rtc><rt>kám-ū</rt></rtc> > </ruby> > <ruby> > <rb>聽</rb><rb>著</rb> > <rtc><rt>ㄊㄧㆩ</rt><rt>ㄉㄧㄜㆷ̍</rt></rtc> > <rtc><rt>thiann-tio̍h</rt></rtc> > </ruby> > > If that would cause some problem, then you should clarify how such > problem may be caused by the use-case. Actually, unless I'm missing something (which is certainly possible!) I don't see that it would require being split into multiple <ruby> elements. Normally, the above is equivalent to: <ruby> <rb>你</rb> <rtc><rt>ㄌㄧˋ</rt></rtc> <rtc>Lí</rt></rtc> <rb>敢</rb><rb>有</rb> <rtc><rt>ㄍㆰˋ</rt><rt>ㄨ˫</rt></rtc> <rtc><rt>kám-ū</rt></rtc> <rb>聽</rb><rb>著</rb> <rtc><rt>ㄊㄧㆩ</rt><rt>ㄉㄧㄜㆷ̍</rt></rtc> <rtc><rt>thiann-tio̍h</rt></rtc> </ruby> And in fact, relying on both the tag closing and the pairing algorithm it can be shortened to: <ruby> 你 <rt>ㄌㄧˋ <rtc>Lí 敢<rb>有 <rtc>ㄍㆰˋ<rt>ㄨ˫ <rtc>kám-ū 聽<rb>著 <rtc>ㄊㄧㆩ<rt>ㄉㄧㄜㆷ̍ <rtc>thiann-tio̍h </ruby> Admittedly, it could be more readable to actually use more elements — but that's an author's choice. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 23 December 2013 11:12:48 UTC