- From: Eric Muller <emuller@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:38:38 -0700
- To: "public-i18n-cjk@w3.org" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
You seem to believe that the r/u part of UTR#50 values forces or at least encourages fallback to be implemented. For example: - in your message to this list on 9/28, 4:29AM (the first that day) (paraphrased to make sense): "John says that CSS should prohibit the implementation of fallback, I disagree because we should allow any Unicode-compliant impl as CSS-compliant" - in your message to this list on 10/15, 5:23AM, you say (again paraphrased) "UTR50 says fallback should be attempted" Because the property is informative: - prohibiting fallback (or any other choice, for that matter) does not make the implementation non-Unicode-compliant - UTR50 does not recommend fallback. At best, UTR 50 says "if you want to implement fallback, then you might want to fallback to r (or u)". The "if" is entirely in the hands of CSS. Eric.
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 22:39:04 UTC