- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:46:44 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-cjk@w3.org, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
On 25/09/2013 12:03 , Ivan Herman wrote:
> (1) section 2.1, last item on 'ruby-text-container': shouldn't that
> item refer to HTML/XHTML <rtc> element, rather than <ruby>? This
> would also make it consistent with the UA style sheet in Appendix A
> ('Supporting Ruby Layout')
There's a small but existing possibility that this is referring to
HTML5's <ruby>-inside-<ruby> feature which is sort of an <rtc>. If so,
this should be clarified (since it might simply go away). If not, it's
indeed an error.
> (2) section 2.1, the penultimate item refers to the XHTML <rbc>
> element (note that it does not refer to HTML...), and the same
> element also appears in the UA style sheet in Appendix A (referring
> to XHTML _and_ HTML). However, that element is not defined in[2]...
Overall I agree with Chris's notes here, though I'm not convinced that a
rule for rbc should be in the default UA style sheet. HTML5 has a style
sheet in its Rendering chapter, and I certainly wouldn't include that
part (given that even if one uses XHTML, it's XHTML5 which does not have
rbc).
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 12:46:54 UTC