- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 02:35:39 +0800
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, 董福興 <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, "CJK discussion (public-i18n-cjk@w3.org)" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, "Freedom Tan (陳官辰)" <Freedom.Tan@mediatek.com>
(13/03/08 2:14), Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
> I can verify that "We want this tone mark positioning behavior in all
> contexts, right? Not just when Bopomofo is used with Ruby." is correct.
> As an example for Taiwanese folks, you should have seen
>
> 很ㄅ一ㄤˋ的
>
> , where ㄅ一ㄤˋ is stacked vertically in a night market or somewhere.
> And no, ㄅ一ㄤˋ is not ruby. It is not associated with any other character.
To make sure I am not confusing people. The main direction of the text
above is horizontal. I quickly asked Google and found a picture[1] about
this at the first page:
ㄅㄠˇㄅㄠˇ
It is somewhat arguable whether this is semantically ruby in this sense:
<ruby><rb>寶</rb><rt>ㄅㄠˇ</rt><rb>寶</rb><rt>ㄅㄠˇ</rt></ruby>
with
rb { display: none; }
. So....
Other Taiwanese folks, can you verify that ㄅ一ㄤˋ does not have a
corresponding Chinese character?
[1]
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_-oSMYrG-kjk/SRRQRfFiiAI/AAAAAAAAACs/NMK7QxsBZcU/s400/phonetics3.gif
Cheers,
Kenny
--
Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing
Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 18:42:10 UTC