Re: Ruby: Requirements and prioritization

That's why the title if this mail contains "prioritarization'.
Which feature is critical and urgent?  Standardization without
appropriate prioritization is unlikely to address market
needs.

I guess that bopomofo ruby is more urgent and more
important than anything else about ruby.

Regards,
Makoto

2013年2月27日水曜日 Ishii, Koji a | Koji | BLD koji.a.ishii@mail.rakuten.com:

> > > I am hearing from Google Japan that they are seeing requirements for
> > > double-sided ruby from their users.  I believe that Amazon are also
> > > interested in getting support.
> >
> > I am wondering if they have written down requirements.
>
> Let's stop discussing on whether double-sided ruby is required or not. The
> fact is that, it is required for some people. Not needed at all for others.
> So such two parties would never agree whether it's needed or not.
>
> The feature should be designed to make it optional for people who doesn't
> need it, and if you don't need it, the feature does nothing bad to you.
>
> /koji
>
>
>

-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto