- From: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 03:21:22 +0900
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote on 2013/02/03 17:21:23 > On 02/02/2013 12:54 PM, fantasai wrote: > > On 02/01/2013 10:33 PM, MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote: > >> > >> I think this behavior is much better than to hide ruby in many cases. > > > > OK. So, there are several things we could do with the spec, which of these do > > you recommend? > > > > Question 1: > > > > Should we remove allowing to hide ruby when emphasis marks are present? > > a) yes > > b) no > > Third option: > > c) Allow hiding emphasis marks when ruby and marks are both present, > instead of hiding ruby when both are present. Yes, c), when stacking ruby and marks is difficult, due to the narrow leading or the implementation costs. Shinyu Murakami Antenna House
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 18:21:52 UTC