On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp> wrote: > >> I didn't go that far, but CSS WG to make a forever > >> commitment for compatibility with external body sounds > >> like a bit over-commit to me, isn't it? > > > > What "external body" are you referring to? > > I don't know, who manages the spec in Apache FOP project? > I guess you misunderstood me. There is no Apache FOP spec. FOP is an implementation of W3C's XSL-FO spec. The spec is the W3C XSL-FO spec. Which is at version 1.1 [1], but a version 2.0 was drafted [2], which, though not actively being pursued at this time, does not mean it won't be in the future (in the W3C). Some persons in this thread/forum have implied that XSL-FO is dead. I am merely disputing such imputations. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20/
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 14:03:16 UTC