- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:32:30 -0700
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, koba <koba@antenna.co.jp>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, www-style@w3.org, MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "public-i18n-cjk@w3.org" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> XSL-FO is effectively a dead technology, one which we shouldn't worry >> about when thinking about naming. > > Why do I get the impression you would say the same thing about XML? I would, though it's not nearly as dead as XSL-FO is. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 17:33:23 UTC