W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-cjk@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Arguments against HTML double-sided ruby (was: Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland)

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:18:08 +0100
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: (wrong string) ├╝rst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <20120229171808162980.0e3fccf0@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Just a typo:

Leif Halvard Silli, Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:02:29 +0100:
> But is there not a 
> big risk that even if we only permit and support nested ruby, some 
> authors will nevertheless create double ruby

I meant: 'even if we only permit and support _single_ ruby'
-- 
Leif Halvard Silli
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 16:18:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:59:17 UTC