- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:21:23 +0900
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- CC: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, "CJK discussion (public-i18n-cjk@w3.org)" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On 2012/01/23 11:17, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > I therefore hope that you at leas agree that the examples in the HTML5 > spec should be changed to demonstrate use of<rb>. Because, after all, > we believe there is benefit in using it. If we don't demonstrate that > we believe in<rb>, then the Chairs get the impression that is not very > controversial to not include it. Using <rb> in most of the examples, and adding examples where <rb> shows its advantages, is definitely a good idea. But that's separate from making <rb> required in all cases. Regards, Martin.
Received on Monday, 23 January 2012 03:22:01 UTC