- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:12:46 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: public-i18n-cjk@w3.org, WWW International <www-international@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 18:13:43 UTC
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:30 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>wrote: > On 01/12/2012 07:53 AM, Richard Ishida wrote: > >> Ian Hickson, the HTML5 editor, is waiting for us to make some clear >> recommendations about whether rb is needed for simple ruby >> markup, and how to approach complex ruby support. >> Here are some key questions: >> >> 1. do we need rb for simple ruby, or will span suffice? (take into >> account the use case related to fallback) >> >> 2. do we need rb and rtc for complex ruby support, or is it sufficient to >> rely on a mixture of recursive ruby markup plus a >> second <rt> element (depending on the use case)? >> > > I think the inclusion of <rb> allows solving all the use cases in > a consistent and extendable way +1 for inclusion of <rb>
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 18:13:43 UTC