- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:49:49 +0000
- To: public-i18n-cjk@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13113 --- Comment #20 from fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net> 2011-11-29 00:49:46 UTC --- > Jukugo is a stylistic variant of group ruby, This is not true. > again to be handled in CSS. CSS can handle jukugo vs. mono rendering at the stylistic level *iff* both the pairing and the word-boundary information is recorded in the HTML. Group ruby doesn't record any sub-word pairing information, because there isn't any, so you'll have to explain better what you mean by this sentence. > defining the outer level as a phrase-level annotation This doesn't make sense for, e.g. double annotating kanji with both kana and romaji. > we should consider supporting multiple <rt>s per base, if there is reason to > believe that multiple monoruby annotations at the ends of lines are common. I have no idea what this is referring to. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 00:49:53 UTC