- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:21:49 +0000
- To: public-i18n-cjk@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10830 --- Comment #40 from Addison Phillips <addison@lab126.com> 2011-08-26 19:21:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #39) > From the EDITOR'S RESPONSE "please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, > and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker > issue yourself, if you are able to do so" > > Does anybody want to propose title and text for the tracker issue? Or to > create the tracker issue themselves? Title: restore <rb> as an optional element Text: In all the web sites that we looked at that currently use ruby markup in the wild, over 90% of code uses the rb tag and most of the current browser versions support the tag. The current HTML5 model for ruby simplifies the code generally, but making the rb element obsolete will make most existing ruby code non-conformant and make it more difficult to copy code that follows the Ruby Annotation model, from XML or other formats, into HTML5. The editor has repeatedly denied requests for this element to be restored, although both CJK and I18N communities support its inclusion for backwards compatibility with existing Web content, existing browser implementations, and for occasional practicality in styling ruby base text. Although the HTML5 ruby model does not require its use and although we do not believe it should be required, we would like the <rb> element restored as an optional element within HTML5 ruby. Please restore the <rb> tag as an optional element. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You reported the bug.
Received on Friday, 26 August 2011 19:21:50 UTC