- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:34:46 -0800
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@w3.org>
- CC: ML public-i18n-core <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On 02/16/2011 12:03 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > (11/02/17 4:33), fantasai wrote: >> [snip] >> I am not sure if text-transform: fullwidth should affect U+0020. It makes sense to me >> either way. > > I tried some examples and found it weird to have U+0020 in between two fullwidth > Latin characters. I'll be interested in seeing a real world example and its use > case. Perhaps I am missing something. It is potentially a very significant change to implementations to have U+0020 change to U+3000 because this will require that text-transform happens after white space collapsing. Right now implementations can do either: they can transform before or after white space collapsing. So I think we should make sure that this is needed in real-world cases before we make this change. Note that U+3000 has very different behavior from U+0020 -- it is not just a visual change. It has different line-wrapping behavior, it has different justification behavior, and it is not affected by the 'word-spacing' property. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 22:28:04 UTC