W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-cjk@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [css3-lists] CJK numbering algorithms

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:24:09 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTiko9XkOtb=HieQaixSHCqCJaWMoKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "CJK discussion (public-i18n-cjk@w3.org)" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp> wrote:
>> I've made the change and rearranged the sections accordingly.  Can
>> everyone check out
>> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-lists/#cjk-counter-styles> and make sure
>> I haven't done anything dumb?
> Thanks Tab, this looks great. Allow me to make two comments:
> * The fallback is used only for Korean, so I can't speak for them much, but I guess ''cjk-decimal'' might work better. Glyphs are closer, and the behavior in vertical writing is more similar.

Ooh, good idea.  I'll switch it.

> * Digit 0 for japanese-formal. It's not a big deal since it's used only for value "0", but I'd like this be U+3007 as well.
> OOXML/ODF spec says this style doesn't use digit 0, but a quick reverse engineering shows that they use U+3007 (or maybe they fallback to japanese-informal or cjk-decimal, the spec isn't clear about this.)

K, I'll switch that one too.  I wasn't sure.

> Also, you're right that lists don't use decimals, if authors put decimals in text, using different glyphs of digit 0 for lists and text doesn't look very good.

Good point.

Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 15:27:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:59:16 UTC