- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:19:39 -0500
- To: "bugzilla@jessica.w3.org" <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>, "public-i18n-cjk@w3.org" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
I'm not used to using W3C Bug Tracking service, I'm sorry in advance if this is inappropriate way to respond to an issue. I also apologize for the late comment. I was reviewing HTML5 ruby for accessibility purposes, and I found that without rb tag, accessibility readers cannot distinguish base characters to highlight when multiple rt exist through DOM. <ruby> B1<rt>R1</rt> B2<rt>R2</rt> </ruby> When reader is reading "R1", I can't get "B1" through DOM as far as I understand. Apps want to distinguish which rt corresponds to which base characters, and I suppose rb tag is the one that gives me. Could you please reconsider the decision? Regards, Koji -----Original Message----- From: public-i18n-cjk-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-cjk-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of bugzilla@jessica.w3.org Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 10:40 PM To: public-i18n-cjk@w3.org Subject: [Bug 10830] New: i18n comment : Please add support for rb http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10830 Summary: i18n comment : Please add support for rb Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: public-i18n-cjk@w3.org QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, public-i18n-cjk@w3.org Comment from the i18n review of: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/ Comment 7 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0802-html5/ Editorial/substantive: E Tracked by: RI Location in reviewed document: 4.6.18 The ruby element [http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-html5-20100624/text-level-semantics.html#the-ruby-element] Comment:In all the web sites that we looked at that currently use ruby markup in the wild, over 90% of code uses the rb tag. The current HTML5 model for ruby simplifies the code generally, but making the rb element obsolete will make most existing ruby code non-conformant and make it more difficult to copy code that follows the Ruby Annotation model, from XML or other formats, into HTML5. Please allow optional use of the rb element as part of the HTML5 model. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 29 December 2010 03:23:04 UTC