Fwd: Re: [minutes] Internationalization telecon 2016-08-04 with Social Web WG

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [minutes] Internationalization telecon 2016-08-04 with 
Social Web  WG
Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 19:38:26 +0000
Resent-From: www-international@w3.org
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:36:10 +0100
From: ishida@w3.org
To: www International <www-international@w3.org>, public-socialweb@w3.org

On 05/08/2016 13:31, ishida@w3.org wrote:
>   jasnell: Whatever we do with the metadata, however we indicate
>    this base direction, there is definitely a tradeoff cost
>    ... We already have some complexity of name and nameMap
>    ... I'm suspecting that the property approach is probably goign
>    to be the most reliable for the base direction. Some
>    combination of this property and the control codes
>    ... But we need to take that time to balance the approach
>    against existing complexity of name vs nameMap
>    ... We should take our time, put together a proposal


I just posted some notes that may be of help for your discussion and 
proposal at

https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Activity_Streams_direction_notes

These notes are not proposals, just observations and lines of thought 
that may be germaine to the topic.  There were some things i mentioned 
on the telecon that were a little complicated to discuss in the time 
available - i thought through those things while creating the page.

It's definitedly possible that i'm misunderstanding something about how 
Activity Streams works, and if so i hope you help me to a better 
understanding gently.

I also reopened https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/336 since 
i think that's the issue we were discussing on Thursday. I added a link 
to the above notes.

hope that helps,
ri

Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2016 12:12:57 UTC