- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:15:09 +0000
- To: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23260 --- Comment #11 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> --- My point is that I proposed all this three years ago, and was told it was impossible because of backwards compatibility concerns, which seemed (and still seem) quite valid and compelling. If the idea was bad three years ago because of compatibility concerns, why is it not bad now because of compatibility concerns? I don't understand how it could have gotten _less_ bad. The content that would have broken then is still there, and we've probably added an order of magnitude more content since. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 18:15:14 UTC