- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:39:22 +0000
- To: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
On 08/02/2013 02:51, Jens O. Meiert wrote: > Briefly, regarding <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-bidi/>: > > The whole document looks more like a Working Group Note than a > specification/recommendation to me—can somebody share what makes it a > specification? Or am I misunderstanding the W3C Process here? Read the status section ;-) "The Working Group expects this Working Draft to become a Working Group Note." What made you think it was a recommendation? > > Then, is this actually being worked on, did either the WHATWG or the > W3C HTML WG comment on this? Most of the ideas recommended in the WG were picked up and implemented by HTML and CSS WGs. We have a plan to finalise and publish this document as a historical record when the final details wrt HTML5 support are ironed out (so that we can complete the subsections that describe what was actually implemented). RI -- Richard Ishida
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 10:39:45 UTC