- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 06:59:38 +0000
- To: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17835 --- Comment #12 from Aharon Lanin <aharon.lists.lanin@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #11) > I don't follow. Why would you want the neutrals to always be ltr? See comments 1 and 3 from the original bug, i.e.: #1 fantasai 2012-03-29 00:24:40 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The reason for the current spec language is to keep the reordering results consistent with plaintext. In plaintext, a paragraph of neutral characters is ordered LTR. I don't mind defaulting to the inherited direction when the element is empty, if that makes for a better UI, but when it has neutral content, it should default to LTR regardless of the inherited direction. ================================================================================ #3 Aharon Lanin 2012-03-29 10:39:29 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [...] I agree with fantasai. That is, the textarea in <div dir=rtl><textarea dir=auto>--></textarea></div> has to be displayed as "-->" (i.e. LTR), not <--, despite the parent being RTL. If, for a neutral value, it depended on the ancestor, then the display when entered will not necessarily match the way it is later displayed in a <pre> which happens to be displayed in a parent of the other directionality, e.g. in an opposite-directionality page. Also, LTR for all-neutral happens to work nicely for phone numbers (e.g. "(987) 654-3210"), which need to be displayed LTR. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 06:59:52 UTC