- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:33:24 -0800
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>, ML publc-i18n-bidi <public-i18n-bidi@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > (Cc+ public-i18n-bidi) > > (11/12/01 8:22), Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:03 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: >>> There are multiple features in css3-images that can transform an >>> image. For example: >>> >>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#image-notation defines the >>> 'ltr' and 'rtl' keywords which can cause an image to be flipped >>> horizontally. >>> >>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#image-orientation defines the >>> image-orientation property which can cause an image to be rotated. >>> >>> It matters which one happens first, since doing them in a different >>> order produces different results when image-orientation computes to >>> 90deg or 270deg. css3-images should define a processing model that >>> says so. >> [snip] >> >> Though, I guess they could potentially interact once 'content' can >> define replaced elements. In that case, I think 'image-orientation' >> should apply *after* the contents have resolved to an image. I'll add >> some text to that effect. > > The spec now says > > # If the image itself is transformed in some way (for example, if the > # content of an element is provided by the ‘image()’ function with a > # directionality opposite the element's directionality), the image's > # transformation must be applied before ‘image-orientation’ is. As > # well, ‘image-orientation’ must be applied before any further > # transformation of the element, such as through CSS Transforms. > > Is this actually right? I thought 'image-orientation' is meant to allow > you to "correct" the image, say, from 「↑」 to「→」, so it should happen > before anything else. If ltr/rtl reflection happens before 'image- > orientation'(「↑」to 「↑」), you get only「→」instead of both 「→」and > 「←」. > > Am I missing something? Hm, that makes a lot of sense, particularly when we add an 'auto' value for handling EXIF data. Changed and recorded in the issue list. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2012 01:34:17 UTC