Please note that the last three messages in the thread below have gone only to public-i18n-bidi, and not to www-style. That is because I took www-style off an earlier message that was discussing issues in the Unicode proposal itself, which I believe was not relevant to the CSS list. On the other hand, these three messages do seem relevant to www-style, so I am reposting. Aharon On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > On 5/15/2012 1:55 PM, fantasai wrote: > >> On 05/15/2012 01:30 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: >> >>> >>> I agree. I raised this issue last week in Hanover at the CSS WG meeting, >>> to which fantasai replied that there was a plan to >>> modify Unicode to maintain harmony. However, it would seem that may not >>> be the case. >>> >> >> To be clear, you asked me why CSS3 had isolation at all when Unicode did >> not, not >> whether it's behavior in the edge cases Aharon just brought forward >> yesterday is >> identical to that defined in the new proposals for Unicode. >> >> ~fantasai >> >> >> OK, let's not deep-end here on the details of past conversations. > > The important thing is that if both Unicode and CSS add "isolate" that > the two groups please make sure that those specifications are compatible. > > Approving two identically named features with different behavior is > very problematic. > > A./ > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 15:03:41 UTC