- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:40:00 +0000
- To: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11234
Aharon Lanin <aharon.lists.lanin@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #17 from Aharon Lanin <aharon.lists.lanin@gmail.com> 2011-08-21 15:39:59 UTC ---
The change looks great, with two small flaws:
1. The treatment given to an element that is flow content but is not also
phrasing content should be extended to <br>, which also serves as a bidi
paragraph break, and thus (by design) terminates the effects of the bidi
formatting characters.
2. The comment that the formatting characters interact poorly with CSS is too
narrow - they also interact poorly with some HTML features (even when used as
currently spec'ed). An example:
<div dir=rtl>‪If this works I will eat my <input />.‬</div>
The <input> will have RTL directionality despite being between an LRE and its
matching PDF.
I am not suggesting adding this example or changing the validity spec - just
expanding the note to include some unspecified HTML features (as opposed to
just CSS).
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 21 August 2011 15:40:04 UTC