- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:36:19 +0000
- To: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10828 --- Comment #53 from CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com> 2011-02-15 21:36:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #51) > Sorry for the delay in reviewing this - I had to track down the correct people. > We think IE standards mode is the correct behaviour. <br> is intended to be a > line break and not a paragraph break. <p> is for paragraphs. The spec says "br > elements must not be used for separating thematic groups in a paragraph" and > further says that this is an abuse of the <br> element. > <br> should mean a line break within a paragraph and not be treated as a > paragraph break. We don't currently plan to change this behaviour in IE9. Hi. This is o.k. for me I guess. I do wonder, however, would it be worthwhile to have a non-default option for break [br] in css that behaved as a paragraph break rather than as simply a line break? (The problem with [p] [/p] for some coders is it's considered best to close it and it is declared at the beginning of the line not the end; however for poetry [br] only makes sense as a line and not a paragraph break.) Best, --C. E. Whitehead cewcathar@hotmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You reported the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 21:36:20 UTC