- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:26:20 +0000
- To: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10827
CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cewcathar@hotmail.com
--- Comment #18 from CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com> 2010-12-06 02:26:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> > Are you saying that you were trying to illustrate what can go wrong?
> Yes. I've tried to make this clearer.
> > I do not think that the spec should give buggy code as an
> > example, especially without stating extremely clearly that it is buggy and
> > without giving a correct version.
> It's not buggy code for most purposes. You're simply not going to be able to
> convince people writing LTR-only sites (e.g. the majority of Web authors) to
> worry about what happens when their alert()s happen to start with user-provided
> RTL text.
> I've added an example that handles it correctly though.
Thanks!
Best,
--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar@hotmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You reported the bug.
Received on Monday, 6 December 2010 02:26:22 UTC