- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:03:20 +0000
- To: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10807 --- Comment #28 from Aharon Lanin <aharon.lists.lanin@gmail.com> 2010-11-04 00:03:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > I think <ubi> is just as confusing as <bdi>, the advantage of the latter is in > fact the similarity with <bdo> — they'd appear together on alphabetical lists, > they'd have an obvious relationship, and people looking for one but remembering > the other could thus likely find what they wanted more easily. Good points. > There's never a reason to make this paragraph-level, > right? (Paragraphs are always isolated?) Right. > Generally we only add global > attributes when you'd use the attribute on all kinds of elements, not just > phrasing content. Ok. The proposed solution, as I understand it: - new bdi element, gets unicode-bidi:isolate in default stylesheet, otherwise same as span. - bdi element has dir=auto by default (pending the final outcome of bug 10808) - output element gets unicode-bidi:isolate in default stylesheet. If so, looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You reported the bug.
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 00:03:22 UTC