- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:48:13 +0000
- To: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10812
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #6 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-10-14 07:48:13 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale:
Unicode is a normative reference, and except where otherwise specified, it is
therefore entirely normative. The few places where it _is_ otherwise specified
are e.g. in the rendering section, where the specification defines the
suggested behaviour in terms of CSS, which itself overrides Unicode in certain
specific places but by and large defers straight to Unicode, normatively.
So I don't think that this is undefined. Firefox and Opera are wrong here. File
bugs, pointing to Unicode. If they disagree, send me links to the bugs where
they disagree and I'll help out in whatever way I can.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You reported the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 07:48:15 UTC