- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 18:42:49 +0000
- To: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10815 --- Comment #9 from Aharon Lanin <aharon.lists.lanin@gmail.com> 2010-10-09 18:42:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > > It seems most browsers don't implement that, though. > > Actually, Gecko has. And it does give better results for bidi cases, although > isolation would be better. (Isolation was not a possibility when HTML4 was > written; the closest you could get was to embed.) Since it will not break > existing documents, and would prevent unexpected and rather confusing > bidi-related breakage, I strongly recommend that the HTML5 spec port this > requirement from HTML4 to HTML5. I am not sure what you mean about porting the requirement. If we get the unicode-bidi:isolate to be applied by default to block elements (except for those with ubi=off) as proposed above, we do not need the embedding, and the HTML4 requirement for embedding should be left out of HTML5, as it apparently already is. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You reported the bug.
Received on Saturday, 9 October 2010 18:42:50 UTC