- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:08:37 -0700
- To: "Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin" <aharon@google.com>
- CC: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org, W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
On 09/27/2010 04:14 AM, Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin wrote: > The spec says "uninterrupted by a forced (bidi class B) line break or > block boundary". > > According to the proposal (sections 3.1 and 3.3), <br> (by default) and > <div>...</div> form UBA paragraph breaks, i.e. those bidi class B line > breaks and block boundaries. > > But unicode-bidi:isolate says that when it's applied to an element, it > acts as U+FFFC, an ON in its surrounding paragraph. So, is <br ubi> or a > <div ubi /> a B or an ON? It is quite easy to think that it is in fact > an ON. However, during the f2f, we explicitly said ubi does not have any > effect on non-inline elements. Hm, I guess for <br ubi> it would mean it is treated as U+FFFC. This probably makes sense, if ubi were allowed on that element. But <div ubi/> is a block element; it creates block boundaries before and after it, and so it is treated as a hard bidi paragraph break. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 05:09:49 UTC