- From: Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin <aharon@google.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:25:59 +0200
- To: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTi=EPXf8fAPvx61etHodTw_zrcE_hvHMn3SuHJ0P@mail.gmail.com>
The current definition<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text-layout/#unicode-bidi>of unicode-bidi:isolate states: "For the purposes of the Unicode bidirectional algorithm, the contents of the element are considered to be inside a separate, independent paragraph, and for the purpose of bidi resolution in its containing paragraph (if any), the element itself is treated as if it were an Object Replacement Character (U+FFFC). (If the element is broken across multiple lines, then each box of the element is treated as an Object Replacement Character.)" I think that it is worthwhile to stipulate that unicode-bidi:isolate has no effect whatsoever on any element that either creates a separate UBA paragraph, or serves as a UBA paragraph break in its containing UBA paragraph. Such elements include: any element taken "out of flow" e.g. with float or position:absolute, any element with display other than "inline", <br bidibreak=hard>, <textarea>, <input type="text">. This stipulation is particularly important for the display:block and <br bidibreak=hard> elements, for whom unicode-bidi:isolate's specification that the element be treated in the containing paragraph as if it were U+FFFC, i.e. bidi class ON, conflicts with the proposed specification<https://docs0.google.com/a/google.com/document/edit?id=1zR06HjhVvt7ySAJeqq7zQZSzpLTRgV8AoQNo_vNznX4&pli=1&authkey=CIXomoYI#>that these element be treated in the containing paragraph as if they were bidi class B. Thus, <div dir=auto> still serves as a UBA paragraph break between what follows and precedes it despite having ubi by default. Same for the (less useful, but theoretically possible) <br ubi>. Aharon
Received on Sunday, 26 September 2010 00:27:17 UTC