- From: CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:00:24 -0400
- To: <public-i18n-bidi@w3.org>, <aharon@google.com>
From: Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin <aharon@google.com> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:25:53 +0300 > c. The CSS initial value will be “start”. However, to get markers to > appear > all on one side in most cases, the default style sheet will specify > ":not(li)> ol, :not(li)> ul { list-style-direction:match-me;}". (The > reason we can't change the CSS initial value is because list-style- > direction > is effectively 'start' according to CSS2.1, and this default behavior > cannot > be changed later. CSS2.1 will not change because there are use cases for > the > current behavior and we already have interop on it.) > [Editor’s note: “left”, “right”, and “start” seem to be alignment values, > not direction values. We are trying to deal with marker direction, which > affects not only where the marker is going to be displayed, but the way > the > marker’s text will be displayed (e.g. where the period of an ordered > marker > goes). It therefore seems that this section needs to be redesigned. > Perhaps > the values should be simply “like-list” and “like-item”, with > inheritance.] Hi, Aharon, all: "like-list" "like-item" are o.k. although "left", "right", and "start" are perfectly clear! Maybe "left" "right" and "inherit-list" A margin could be defined I think anytime you had something aligned with that margin. So you might have one or two margins defined, depending on whether elements in a doc aligned with one or the other or both. Thanks! --C. E. Whitehead cewcathar@hotmail.com
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 18:01:01 UTC