- From: Simon Montagu <smontagu@smontagu.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:48:02 +0200
- To: "Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin" <aharon@google.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
On 03/17/2010 04:05 PM, Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin wrote: > If I remember correctly, all browsers until very recently treated text in a > <div style="display:inline"> as if it were in a<span>. I now see that > Firefox 3.6 has indeed broken ranks and is now treating it as if it were a > <span style="unicode-bide:embed">.I am not sure what the rationale for this > is. The rationale was that is is what the HTML 4 spec says, at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/dirlang.html#style-bidi: "When a block element that does not have a dir attribute is transformed to the style of an inline element by a style sheet, the resulting presentation should be equivalent, in terms of bidirectional formatting, to the formatting obtained by explicitly adding a dir attribute (assigned the inherited value) to the transformed element." See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503957 for the history. > IMO, using unicode-bidi:embed without specifying direction, i.e. > defaulting to the parent's direction, is a technique in search of a purpose. I'm not sure what you're saying here. Is that good or bad?
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 20:48:37 UTC