- From: Yasuo Kida （木田泰夫） via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 05:49:14 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
All right. Are there anything else you want the task force to do other than to discuss how we support the link targets, and possibly adjust the section structure? By the way, the shorthand name -lreq was the source of my confusion, and I still find it a bit unclear. The abbreviation (language line layout requirements?) doesn’t relate to the spelling of “Script Resources” and is almost identical to the shorthand name of xxlreq documents. Could it be changed to something closer to “Script Resource”? or actually as it is not that long can it always be fully spelled? -- GitHub Notification of comment by kidayasuo Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/438#issuecomment-2252021528 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 26 July 2024 05:49:15 UTC