Re: [i18n-activity] Discuss i18n-glossary and Infra harmonization (#1815)

> there are places in W3C where Infra is difficult to use or where the WGs are reluctant to use it

Could you elaborate on either of these? Infra is meant to give a standard set of low-level primitive spec objects and algorithms that ensure the web platform doesn't gratuitously differ in unimportant areas by accident. If an Infra type is difficult to use for some reason, that's likely fixable.

I'm less certain of why anyone would be "reluctant to use it", tho. It's already widely used across web platform specs, and *not* using it makes it more difficult to interoperate with web platform specs that *do* use it, at least in a well-defined manner. Elaboration on this point, especially, would be valuable.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1815#issuecomment-1917917046 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2024 21:23:08 UTC