Re: [jlreq] todo: Update Ruby terminology wiki and solicit feedback from clreq (#385)

The JLreq TF finds that terms for sou-ruby/para-ruby are not used anywhere.  In our understanding, neither HTML nor CSS need such terms.  (Correct us if we are wrong.)  

The only exception is [Schema.org Accessibility Properties for Discoverability Vocabulary ](https://www.w3.org/community/reports/a11y-discov-vocab/CG-FINAL-vocabulary-20230718/).  It does distinguish publications containing sou-ruby and those containing para-ruby.  But for this purpose, I introduced two values (fullRubyAnnotations and rubyAnnotations) and described their semantics in prose without using sou-ruby/para-ruby.  Thus, there are no reasons to standardize terms for sou-ruby and para-ruby.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by murata2makoto
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/385#issuecomment-1879564351 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Saturday, 6 January 2024 05:54:45 UTC