Re: [clreq] No bopomofo ruby support (#241)

I applied the new template, but also added text to the problem statement to describe what the gap actually is.  Note also that in principle the spec links should briefly describe whether the specs already provide what is needed, or whether they need work – rather than just linking to relevant sections. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by r12a
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/241#issuecomment-1562912479 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 25 May 2023 13:29:36 UTC