- From: Ryukeikun via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 06:22:57 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
「双面装」「单面装」的「装」，我觉得其实用 setting 就好？ 倒是「行间线」有点难，总不能叫 Interline lines 吧？ Interline line-mark？ > Although the typesetting of ancient Chinese texts is beyond the scope of this document, it can still serve as a reference for the basic principles of interlinear punctuation. 这句英文与中文意思不太对？ > Interlines must not be arbitrarily broken up, a single interline cannot be composed out of multiple fragments either. 这个 either 要改 neither？ 另外从行文上，建议将表示要求的「应」翻译成 shall 而非 must （与所有 ISO 标准文档的措辞一致）即 - requirement：shall（应/应该，只准许） - recommendation：should（宜/推荐，建议） - permitted：may（可/可以，允许） - possible：can（能/能够） -- GitHub Notification of comment by ryukeikun Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/463#issuecomment-1259033964 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2022 06:22:59 UTC