- From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 11:26:35 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
I think a label could indeed work. Another alternative is a wiki page, but the benefit of using a labelled issue is that discussion can appear below the initial comment. One thing to consider is whether to maintain (ie. update via edits) the initial comment, as new ideas emerge (which is natural for a wiki page, but less common in an 'issue'). (This is the approach i take for the gap labelled issues, since only the first comment is pulled into the gap document, and it may well be appropriate here.) Fwiw, there is already a "useful-discussion" label in use in several lreq issue lists which might fit the bill – just a suggestion. If you prefer to use some new label that's fine, too. The useful-discussion labelled items are harvested by the Language Enablement Index, eg. see the "Useful discussions" link at https://www.w3.org/TR/typography/#text_decoration -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq-d/issues/18#issuecomment-1219377951 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2022 11:26:37 UTC