Re: [jlreq] updated per issue #287 (#288)

@r12a Thank you for letting me know (of course I've noticed about PR, though), and congrats for success!

But, I'd go with current style for jlreq as in this PR:

- for gap-analysis, we will include content automatically into WG Note document, and automatically inserted head tags are harmful for presentation
- 'ask a question' might be one possibility to use YAML, like we can have text description at the top of issue submission form, but not much gain for us compared to the current template, since almost no guideline for raising a question.

So, I'd request re-review on this PR from you (@r12a ) and @kidayasuo with the current PR.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by himorin
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/pull/288#issuecomment-1212810467 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 12 August 2022 07:25:32 UTC